Press Office

Reasonable Accommodations: Do the lives of the mentally ill matter to the Supreme Court?

This week the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case of San Francisco v. Sheehan. The case could settle the extent to which the Americans With Disabilities Act serves as a check on police officers’ interactions with people with mental illnesses. The law demands local governments to provide “reasonable accommodations” to individuals with disabilities, and courts have interpreted that guarantee to include arrests—that is, police should take into account the people’s disabilities when taking them into custody. But the law isn’t uniform across the board on whether cops should make such accommodations if the arrestee exhibits violent or erratic behavior. Does an outburst by a woman who is suffering from schizoaffective disorder, hasn’t taken her medication, and is found holding a small bread knife in her own home automatically strip her of legal protection? Read about the case at Slate and the Christian Science Monitor

Return to all news and updates

Share this article

Related articles

CPCS Chief Counsel Discusses Civil Rights and Criminal Justice at Boston College Law Rappaport Center Event

Read more

Tribute to Attorney Ed Barshak, Early Pioneer in Massachusetts Indigent Defense

Read more

Dsida Wins NACC Outstanding Legal Advocate Award

Read more

Reporters seeking comment from CPCS or its attorneys should contact Communications Director Bob McGovern

Breathalyzer Case Inquiry Form

Breathalyzer Case Inquiry Form

Defendant Name(Required)
MM slash DD slash YYYY
Defendant Mailing Address

Drug Lab Case Inquiry Form

Defendant Name(Required)
MM slash DD slash YYYY
Defendant Mailing Address

GPS Monitoring Inquiry Form

Your Name(Required)
Contact Address

MH Hospital Admission Contact Form

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
What is your date of birth?*